Container monitoring environments come in all shapes and sizes. Some are open source while others are commercial. Some are in the Rancher Catalog while others require manual configuration. Some are general purpose while others are aimed specifically at container environments. Some are hosted in the cloud while others require installation on own cluster hosts. Read more
Monitoring your container-based infrastructure is crucial to ensure good performance, identify issues early and gain the insight necessary to maximize its efficiency. When you are dealing with a large number of often short-lived containers spread over multiple hosts and even data centers, understanding the operational health of your infrastructure implies the need to aggregate performance data from both physical hosts as well as the container cluster running on top of it. Ideally, you want to capture and correlate application performance with the underlying infrastructure to troubleshoot and identify bottlenecks. Implementing a monitoring system that satisfies these requirements can be a complex endeavor.
I recently compared several docker monitoring tools and services. Since the article went live we have gotten feedback about additional tools that should be included in our survey. I would like to highlight two such tools; Prometheus and Sysdig cloud. Prometheus is a capable self-hosted solution which is easier to manage than sensu. Sysdig cloud on the other hand provides us with another hosted service much like Scout and Datadog. Collectively they help us add more choices to their respective classes. As before I will be using the following six criteria to evaluate Prometheus and Sysdig cloud: 1) ease of deployment, 2) level of detail of information presented, 3) level of aggregation of information from entire deployment, 4) ability to raise alerts from the data and 5) Ability to monitor non-docker resources 6) cost. Read more